Search for: "State v. Eli" Results 741 - 760 of 982
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am by Melina Padron
will be decided this week, this time by the European Patent Office in Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company [2010] EWCA Civ 33. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
Wade and criminalize abortion care in the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:19 pm
In the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), exhaustion has set in following nearly five hours of oral argument in the technical, tedious disputes over the inner meaning of the law on supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) in Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lily and Georgetown [on which see SPC Blog posts here, here and here]. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:54 am by Frank Cranmer
Bs Thornton pointed out that in 2020, the High Court had ruled (in R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin) at [111]) that the failure to provide humanist marriages in England and Wales was discriminatory and the Government could not simply “sit on its hands” and do nothing – to which Lord Ponsonby responded, not unreasonably, that “the previous Government chose not to respond to the Law Commission report, and we… [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:59 am by joseph bahgat
After spending several days hearing snippets of the prosecution's case in State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:55 am
The Coordinator met with Title V, Medicaid, the DD Council, ICC, state legislators and Iowa's congressional delegation, as well as representing our children with other parent, disability and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
Historians are generally agreed that what stymied this antislavery tide was the invention of the cotton gin by Eli Whitney in 1791. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 4:53 am
The Kat had this brilliant idea for what you get when you cross 'Neutrokine-a' with 'genome' Hot off the press and not yet digested, this morning's ruling of the United Kingdom's Supreme Court in Human Genome Sciences Inc. v Eli Lilly and Company [2011] UKSC 51, will be the subject of considerable analysis in the coming days and weeks. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Bexis
Some states require a physical impact or physical contact; and others do not recognize the cause of action at all.Blain v. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm
The answer is not clear-cut but as a general rule the post-filing data can only be ‘confirmatory’ of disclosure in the specification.As an aside, it is worth mentioning Human Genome Sciences v Eli Lilly where the main issue was how much data is required in the specification to support therapeutic use of an antibody to a new protein (see Katpost here).Why is it important to claim broadly in biotech? [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:44 am by kristanb
In this case, v alue-based billing provides a way for attorneys to still get paid appropriat ely, while also offering more transparency to clients. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
This focused on the three-step test of the Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Supreme Court decision and the subsequent UK cases applying that  test. [read post]