Search for: "State v. Li " Results 741 - 760 of 6,344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
, Tablet, Feb. 9, 2021, https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/douglass-mackey-ricky-vaughn-memes-first-amendment; Complaint, United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon  Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
While our cases prohibiting viewpoint discrimination would fetter the state's power to some degree, see R.A.V. v. [read post]
., vacated its prior decision, and reversed the district court’s judgment that the claims of patent at issue were not invalid (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
An example of this phenomenon lies in a six-justice majority decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:52 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Bosch & Joyeeta Gupta, Water property rights in investor-state contracts on extractive activities, affects water governance: An empirical assessment of 80 contracts in Africa and Asia Case NoteDiego Mejía-Lemos, The right to a healthy environment and its justiciability before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: A critical appraisal of the Lhaka Honhat v Argentina judgement       [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm by Matt Gluck
  Adam Chan described the Supreme Court’s ruling in Torres v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 10:06 am by Ilya Somin
Even if the release of the report proves that the Trump Administration lied about its nature to the courts, that wouldn't necessarily mean that Trump v. [read post]