Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 741 - 760
of 19,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2008, 8:49 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Murray, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1792 (16 July 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Joyce v Secretary of State for Health [2008] EWHC 1891 (Admin) (01 August 2008) High Court (Patents Court) Magical Marking Ltd & Anor v Phillips & Ors [2008] EWHC 1640 (Pat) (07 July 2008) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 10:18 am
[1] Tribunal (Hart) in O.P.T. and M.P.T v Presteve Foods Ltd. and Pratas [2] AB v Singer Shoes and Paul Singer The post New High Water Mark for Human Rights Sexual Harassment Awards appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:25 pm
” (See, Clorox Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 10:18 am
[1] Tribunal (Hart) in O.P.T. and M.P.T v Presteve Foods Ltd. and Pratas [2] AB v Singer Shoes and Paul Singer The post New High Water Mark for Human Rights Sexual Harassment Awards appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:20 pm
See Ozaltin v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 1:15 pm
via lawliberty.org Mark Pulliam. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:01 am
The registration states “women’s high fashion designer ? [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:30 pm
v What’s law got to do with it? [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:47 pm
In Lifter v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
Computer Geeks, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:12 am
Almost a decade ago, in Toyota v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 12:00 am
"Yes, we do this sort of work, but the state also will appoint a lawyer to do it. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:48 am
Both the package and the towel were marked “patent pending. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 10:49 pm
The reasoning in cases such as Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Sport Leisure Pty Ltd (2012) 202 FCR 286 and Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Ltd (2012) 294 ALR 72 no longer apply and organisations will potentially need to reconsider their ownership arrangements in Australia. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 10:49 pm
The reasoning in cases such as Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Sport Leisure Pty Ltd (2012) 202 FCR 286 and Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Ltd (2012) 294 ALR 72 no longer apply and organisations will potentially need to reconsider their ownership arrangements in Australia. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 am
” And in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:45 am
Also, signs which cannot be seen -- such as smells -- may be registered in so far as they can be represented in a manner that is clear and precise, as the Court of Justice of the European Union indicated in Case C-273/00 Sieckmann v DPMA. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 1:27 pm
The argument preview for United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:32 am
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's recent decision in Honda Motor Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
