Search for: "State v. Smart"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2009, 9:10 am
Leathermon v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
Trump v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
Note that many of these questions could be empirically studied, and the results of those empirical studies could inform smart policy resolutions. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
, Inc v Jen, Chi [2019] SGIPOS 3. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
In this regard, the threshold for distinctiveness is not dependent on the public’s level of attention (Smart Technologies v OHIM, C‑311/11 P).Lack of distinctive character of the mark applied forAs regards the issue of distinctive character, the applicant maintained that the relevant public would perceive the mark as the letter ‘v’ for ‘vericiguat’ rather than a representation of a heart. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
In 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Frank A Smart & Sons Ltd (Scotland), heard 6 Mar 2019. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 10:00 am
See People v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:35 am
But 2012 has produced two state supreme court decisions in this area of intellectual property law. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:57 pm
Grounds for Dismissing Bankruptcy Cases On appeal, the court considered the Supreme Court ruling in Freshman v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
Habibullah, American International University, Bangladesh Your Spying Smart Phone: Individual Privacy Is Narrowly Strengthened in Carpenter v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:51 am
Until the Supreme Court filed its June 17, 2022 opinion in Borst Brothers Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 6:46 am
Under the minimal prima facie standard, plaintiffs states a plausible claim. [read post]
2 May 2013, 8:21 am
This is an example of smart (or lucky) lawyering and an overreaching plaintiff. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:51 am
Until the Supreme Court filed its June 17, 2022 opinion in Borst Brothers Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:38 pm
One of the hackers is also charged with seeking to gain control of New York state infrastructure (U.S. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 7:24 am
Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 7:07 am
Specifically, in Irwin v Ciena Health Care Management, Inc. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 6:46 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000 Read More [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 8:28 am
Appjigger GmbH v. [read post]
