Search for: "The Active v. United States" Results 741 - 760 of 18,207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2016, 8:42 am by Heidi A. Nadel
On June 30, 2016, the SJC granted Further Appellate Review on the parties' cross-petitions in Blanchard v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 8:42 am by Heidi A. Nadel
On June 30, 2016, the SJC granted Further Appellate Review on the parties' cross-petitions in Blanchard v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 1:36 pm
Thursday we began a series on the Second Circuit of Court of Appeals decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 9:07 am by Alex Loomis
” § 1605(a)(3) also requires that the state (or its agency or instrumentality named in the suit) “possess the expropriated property or proceeds thereof” and “participate in some kind of commercial activity in the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
United States, No. 13-632, and Johnson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm by WIMS
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 24–27. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 11:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Halo contendsthat those products were sold and offered for sale withinthe United States because negotiationsand contracting activities occurredwithin the United States, (...)The CAFC notedWe agree with Pulse that the district court did not errin granting summary judgment of no direct infringementwith respect to those products that Pulse manufactured,shipped, and delivered outside the United Statesbecause those products were neither sold nor… [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v United States of America) (1984 to 1986)Robert Kolb16. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:40 am by Native American Rights Fund
NY State Dep't of Financial Services (Internet loans, Commerce Clause) United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:11 am by Ingrid Wuerth
In Nelson, the plaintiff was recruited in the United States to work for a state-run Saudi Hospital. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
This morning, the United States Supreme Court declined to review court decisions out of Iowa in KFC Corp. v. [read post]