Search for: "US v. Davis" Results 741 - 760 of 5,131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2021, 8:33 am by ernst
  It is a preview of a longer version of the paper forthcoming in the UC Davis Law Review in the spring, published now because of its relevance to New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Under this “classification-rather-than-class-of-persons” approach, if race is a problematic basis for sorting people (because its use historically has generated socio-political costs) in cases like Brown v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
He uses runners to make bets so it does not look like his bets. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 1:37 am
Library Ass'n, 955 F.2d 1214, 1224 (9th Cir. 1990) (quoting Davis & Cox v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 4:38 am by Susan Brenner
The court also explained that in denying the proposed instruction, the trial judge relied upon Davis v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 3:17 pm by Giles Peaker
The excellent Liz Davies of Garden Court tackled the Court of Appeal decisions in MA & Ors and the benefit cap judgment in SG & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 156. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 3:17 pm by Giles Peaker
The excellent Liz Davies of Garden Court tackled the Court of Appeal decisions in MA & Ors and the benefit cap judgment in SG & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 156. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:52 am by Jeff Foust
The US Court of Federal Claims has scheduled a hearing for 10 am Eastern this morning regarding the motion filed by the US government on Tuesday to lift the preliminary injunction blocking payments to Energomash, the Russian company that manufactures the RD-180 engines used on the Atlas V. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The amendment of the IEEPA statute of limitations has wider implications, as IEEPA is a broad and flexible authority used for other measures related to national security. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:20 am by Laura H. Juillet
In March 2013, in the case of Rowstock Ltd & Davis v Jessemey, the EAT found that victimisation post-employment was not prohibited by the Equality Act, thanks to the express wording in section 108. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 10:32 am by Daniel Nazer
EFF, together with the Organization for Transformative Works, has filed an amicus brief in Davis v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
Powell and Strickland shared primary sources they found in their research which was used to write and illustrate the book. [read post]