Search for: "US v. Hamilton" Results 741 - 760 of 1,825
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2017, 3:56 am by NCC Staff
On June 23, 2005, the Supreme Court ruled in the controversial, landmark case of Kelo v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Holder, in which the Court struck down the coverage formula used to determine which jurisdictions must comply with the preclearance requirement of the Voting Rights Act, and Fisher v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:17 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Leslie Griffin argues that the Court’s 2012 decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Church and School v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:07 am by Howard Friedman
It reached a similar conclusion as to any RLUIPA claim.In Hamilton v. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 10:23 pm by Josh Blackman
Second, Roberts offers this account of the Bank of the United States debate and McCulloch v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
There is no originalism in the majority opinion except for passing references to quite general statements made by Hamilton and Madison. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm by Adam White
Hamilton wasn’t the only one to make this point. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
”   Both clauses use a “catch-all” term, but they differ slightly from one another in terms of their prepositions—a difference to which Trump would attach great significance. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
  At issue in Simmons v. [read post]
Supreme Court issued its decision today on an important issue of chapter 13 bankruptcy law in the case of Hamilton, Chapter 13 Trustee v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
” At KLRU, a documentary discusses affirmative action and Fisher v. [read post]
Editor’s Note: Edward Greene is a partner at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP focusing on corporate law matters. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
    He came up with a well-presented, nuanced argument that the court should use Judge Whiteside’s concurring opinion in the 1982 case of State v. [read post]