Search for: "US v. Jacobs"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2016, 5:06 pm
Theclaim uses [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am
Jacobs, and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST. [read post]
8 May 2018, 4:15 am
Costa/as v Amalfitano, 305 AD2d 202, 204 (1st Dept 2003); see also Jacobs v Kay, 50 AD3d 526, 527 (1st Dept 2008). [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 am
We should crave a space of freedom v. enriched forms of community.Haggerty: Fear drives politics. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am
Sir Robin Jacob, giving the leading judgment, stated that a wide view was intended in the construction of the disclosure as “a function of HMRC” and could extend to the function of “raising more tax revenue“. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 10:26 am
"infringes") irrespective of the patent's validity unless and until the patent is finally declared invalid (see Jacob LJ in Celltech v Medimmune [2004] EWCA Civ 1331). [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:26 am
Commentators continue to parse last week’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am
Fortunately this particular matter has been considered and largely rejected by the UK courts (see Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd [2001] EWHC/Ch/25 ) As mentioned, there is quite a bit of case law on the public interest issue, and those interested in it may find it helpful to read a summary by Jacob J(as he then was) in his first instance hearing of Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland case (see paras [24-34]). [read post]
30 May 2018, 2:55 am
" In sum, the marks are similar in sight, sound, connotation and commercial impression.The Goods and Services: "[T]he mere fact that a restaurant may offer certain food items or beverages does not by itself mean that the food or drink is related to the restaurant services; rather, in order '[t]o establish likelihood of confusion a party must show something more than that similar or even identical marks are used for food products and for restaurant services.'"… [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 6:21 am
Discussion of clarity of claims using the terms “predetermined” or “preset”: updated in light of the decision in Folding Attic Stairs Ltd v Loft Stairs Co. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:40 am
Jacobs reports that, “[i]f coal companies get their way when the Supreme Court reviews U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
A friendly reminder: We rely on our readers to send us links for the round-up. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:16 pm
Kunz v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:00 am
Claeys Ricci v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 6:17 am
Rev. 1245 (2011)| PDF Note Jacob D. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 8:05 pm
.: “Refusal to allow your child to attend this trip will result in a Racial Discrimination note being attached to your child’s education record…” [Althouse] Truly awful idea SCOTUS has helped us dodge so far: constitutional right to education [Andrew Sullivan] Washington Monthly interviews Zach Schrag on institutional review boards (IRBs) [earlier here and here]; Oldie but goodie: dissent from Second Circuit chief judge Dennis Jacobs on College of Staten… [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
–Duguid v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:59 am
New York’s version of bail reform encounters strong pushback amid rash of street attacks [Israel Salas-Rodriguez, Khristina Narizhnaya and Laura Italiano, New York Post; Lauren Krisai, Jason Pye, and Norman Reimer, Slate; Rafael Mangual (New Jersey’s reform compare favorably); Scott Greenfield] “I think if they pay a small [amount of] money to us on the island, it would be better”: Vanuatu indigenous group says bungee jumping has roots in traditional land-diving… [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 9:05 pm
(See, e.g., Rattner v. [read post]
