Search for: "USA v. Doe" Results 741 - 760 of 4,126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by John L. Welch
Of course, even with consent, such an amendment will be accepted only if it does not materially alter the mark. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:48 pm by Larry
We know that because the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said so in Bauer Nike Hockey USA v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:51 pm by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
  This will be the last episode until July 17th or 18th, and it covers: Doe v. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 10:49 pm by Donald Dinnie
  TIG Insurance Company, as successor by merger to American Safety Indemnity Company v Woodsboro Farmers Cooperative No. 23-40435 [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
Last year, I wrote a not-too-flattering piece on a Texas case where the appellate court in Dallas held that a grant of stock options does not constitute sufficient consideration for an employee non-compete agreement. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:36 pm
Smith, for the election and consecration of V. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:11 am by Yishai Schwartz
But in Sokolow, this fact does not apply: the plaintiffs are all American. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:58 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
USA Sports, Inc., 392 F.3d 1317, 1324 (Fed. [read post]