Search for: "United States of America v. Test" Results 741 - 760 of 1,760
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2017, 8:26 am by Eric Caligiuri
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently ruled that the America Invents Act’s (“AIA”) did not change the meaning of the on-sale bar provision in 35 U.S.C. [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:26 am by Eric Caligiuri
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently ruled that the America Invents Act’s (“AIA”) did not change the meaning of the on-sale bar provision in 35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:02 pm by Jeff Gamso
That at any rate is the theory of our Constitution.But if Abrams doesn't quote Black or Holmes in this brief book, he channels them.Here, he says, is how it works in the United States under the First Amendment. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-402, and (apparently) Jordan v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 11:44 am by Steven Cohen
VOLVO CARS OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al – United States District Court – District of New Jersey – April 3rd, 2017) is a putative class action involving the sunroofs of certain cars that were sold to customers by the defendants (Volvo). [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 11:44 am by Steven Cohen
VOLVO CARS OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al – United States District Court – District of New Jersey – April 3rd, 2017) is a putative class action involving the sunroofs of certain cars that were sold to customers by the defendants (Volvo). [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:00 am by Robert Chesney
United States, however, based on a plain-language approach to the statutory phrase “no person. [read post]
“It would risk increased prices and unforeseeable disruption in the clothing industry, which in the United States alone encompasses nearly $370 billion in annual spending and 1.8 million jobs. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:24 am by Rishabh Bhandari, Jordan Brunner
The Post informs us that an influential group of Japanese politicians is publicly arguing Japan to acquire the independent ability to strike North Korea instead of having to rely on the United States for its defense as the threat of North Korean aggression grows in the wake of its recent missile tests. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:24 am by John Elwood
Village at Lakeridge, 15-1509, involves questions so important for the Republic, so pressing for our body politic, that the Supreme Court of the United States called for, and now has received, the views of the solicitor general. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm by Tommy Tobin
The three judge DeCoster appeals panel issued a three-opinion ruling, with the majority advancing a concept of responsible corporate officer liability arising from the FDCA and the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:15 am by Nassiri Law
But the test of whether California law applies involves numerous factors, including: A company is headquartered in the state. [read post]