Search for: "United States v. Carter" Results 741 - 760 of 1,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 7:45 pm by David Kravets
Pregerson appeared via a live video feed from Los Angeles and was not present here at the William Kenzo Nakamura United States Courthouse. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
In granting our motion for preliminary injunction, Judge Shoob credited the NAD decision (a precursor to Judge Carter's decision in the November 2007 case Russian Standard Vodka (USA), Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am by INFORRM
   In the case of Barach v University of New South Wales  [2011] NSWSC 431 the Supreme Court of New South Wales gave the claimant permission to serve libel proceedings on a defendant in the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:38 am
The General Assembly is now weighing in on the Court of Appeals ruling in Bruce Jones v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:37 am by Michele Goodwin
Future historians may credit the nomination and, if confirmed, the first Black woman on the United States Supreme Court, to President Joe Biden for fulfilling a campaign promise. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 11:20 am by Scott Bomboy
The Dewey-Stassen contest was limited to one question: Should the Communist Party be outlawed in the United States? [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
The United States as intervenor and amicus supports the position of the Holy See with respect to the Holy See's status as a foreign state and the constitutionality of the FSIA. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:35 am
Central planning, not the welfare state, is what was incompatible with individual liberty. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
This is true even though the crimes of kidnapping and forcible conscription don't share the same elements.The ICC's provisions thus provide more double jeopardy protection than is available in the United States under the Blockburger test, whereby prosecutions are foreclosed only for crimes that share the same elements. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court found that Regulation 3 does not carry the force of law (see Weiss v. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 8:00 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Meanwhile, Robert Williams contextualized the arrest of Huawei’s CFO in Canada—reportedly at the request of the United States. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:49 am by Peter E. Harrell
But recognizing that the U.S. needed tools to quickly address emerging national security threats that fall short of war, Congress in parallel enacted IEEPA to give the president broad powers to respond to “any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States. [read post]