Search for: "United States v. Rose" Results 741 - 760 of 1,225
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm by Rory Little
  But in 2005, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm by Jack McNeill
Tobacco manufacturers and the United States government: ready for battle. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:18 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  Last week we learned that the United States government has asked for extra time to decide if it will intervene, and it has made clear that its intervention would either support the publishers or favor neither party. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Troice, 12-86; and Proskauer Rose LLP v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:11 am by Jim Walker
   Delta towns like Money and Morgan City were (and remain) part of the most impoverished region in the United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am by Terry Hart
This is especially helpful because the legal and colloquial definitions of monopoly differ throughout history — the term means something different under the current Sherman Antitrust Act, to someone during the era of trust-busting in early 20th century United States, and to a jurist in 18th century England. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 8:13 am
In addition, law schools outside of Canada seek to serve the market for legal education in Canada, with Arizona State University seeking to grant a “North American law degree” to qualify graduates to practise law in both Canada and the United States. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm by Daniel Isenberg
Al- Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 54 - Supreme Court clarifies meaning of “guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations” for the purpose of refusing refugee status, two applicants lose appeal. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
Rose, “Establishing Causation with Epidemiology,” in Tee L. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 8:04 am by Ronald Mann
Moments after Joshua Rosenkranz (arguing for Kirtsaeng) started to present his argument, Justice Ginsburg stopped him to express her concern that the regime he proposed (“universal exhaustion,” as she termed it) would have the United States giving more limited rights to copyright owners than any other country in the world. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm by Glenn
Even if they are correct, the parties pressing for government antitrust action against Google cannot claim the courts have ever recognized the concept of natural monopoly as a surrogate for the United States v. [read post]