Search for: "United States v. Taylor"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2007, 12:27 am
Taylor U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:24 am
Taylor (CVSG 1/14/2008) (Akin Gump for petitioner) (settling FMLA claims) No. 07-543, AT&T v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:49 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 10:47 am
See Taylor v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 4:05 am
As to actual confusion, since Shanghai has not exported any massage apparatus to the United States, "there has been no opportunity for actual, or potential, confusion to occur. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 8:24 am
The Supreme Court’s landmark 2022 gun-rights ruling in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
The United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, affirmed the district court's ruling.Addressing the Retirees' "Contracts Clause" claim, the court said that the Retirees argue that the City’s 2010 Ordinance violates the Constitution's Contracts Clause because "their collective bargaining agreement [CBA] guaranteed that the City would pay the full cost of their health insurance premiums. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
Hitselberger has been charged by the United States of America on three counts of violating 18 U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:42 pm
United States, 459 F.2d 631, 635 (9th Cir. 1972) (same); Black v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:25 am
" United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:20 pm
Roper, and Taylor v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:20 pm
And Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 409, 120 S. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 3:02 am
The United States will be represented by Deputy Solicitor General Greg Garre. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:26 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:54 am
As many commentators had predicted, the Court harkened back to Taylor v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 6:19 am
See Hickman v. [read post]
