Search for: "United States v. Taylor"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
Legislative intent controls in applying personnel rules providing for the liquidation of sick leave accruals upon separation from serviceCounty of Broome v Badger, 2008 NY Slip Op 08230, decided on October 30, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentInitially the Broom County Legislature adopted a personnel rule setting out the payment that would be made to administrative employees [i.e., unrepresented personnel within the meaning of the Taylor Law] for unused sick time as… [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:09 am
As the recent opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in Taylor v. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 11:28 pm
Ct. 2729, 2733 (2011) (citando a United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:22 am
Way back in 1990, the Supreme Court decided Taylor v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
There is a need for more patent quality in SEPs" he stated. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:08 am
In Goldwater v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 4:05 am
As to actual confusion, since Shanghai has not exported any massage apparatus to the United States, "there has been no opportunity for actual, or potential, confusion to occur. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:42 am
The Court ruled 6-3 on March 25 in Young v. [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 8:53 am
Briefs available here.In the news, a Kansas federal district court declared a mistrial in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:24 am
Taylor (CVSG 1/14/2008) (Akin Gump for petitioner) (settling FMLA claims) No. 07-543, AT&T v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
The United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, affirmed the district court's ruling.Addressing the Retirees' "Contracts Clause" claim, the court said that the Retirees argue that the City’s 2010 Ordinance violates the Constitution's Contracts Clause because "their collective bargaining agreement [CBA] guaranteed that the City would pay the full cost of their health insurance premiums. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
In the criminal case United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:45 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
United States, 617 F.2d 755, 765. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
United States, 617 F.2d 755, 765. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm
Taylor, 192 N.Y. 398 (1908); State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 10:47 am
See Taylor v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
Hitselberger has been charged by the United States of America on three counts of violating 18 U.S. [read post]
