Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 7581 - 7600 of 29,832
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2019, 4:57 am by MBettman
Urias-Marrufo, 744 F.3d 361 (5th Dist. 2014)( It is counsel’s duty, not the court’s, to warn of certain immigration consequences, and counsel’s failure cannot be saved by a plea colloquy.) [read post]
8 May 2024, 3:01 pm by Micah Belden
Rojas, 812 F.3d 382 (5th Cir. 2016) (one defendant piloted plane with 600 kilograms of cocaine). [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Doing so in what many regard as an emergency is less devaluation than it is survival.Follow @SherryColb Sherry F. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 1:14 pm
Burkhart Kroeber was given a chance to defend literary translators in the Neue Zürcher Zeitung today. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 12:51 pm by Rohini Kurup
” And it held that in order to defend against the plaintiffs’ claims, the government defendants would have to rely on state secrets material that was inextricably tied to nonprivileged material. [read post]
3 May 2020, 10:48 am by Giles Peaker
The FTT had decided that the front entrance doors were a fixture and that Mr F was in breach of lease. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
Police surrounding defendant's porch did not constitute an arrest. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 3:32 pm
On November 4, as the nation busied itself with other matters, the DC Circuit issued a very interesting opinion in a case called Emergency Coalition to Defend Educational Travel v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
App. 2008) (applying “substantially certain” standard of Restatement §8A).Arkansas:  Arkansas has a punitive damages statute requiring that the defendant ‘knew or ought to have known . [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 3:16 pm
For these reasons, the lower standard can cut both ways, in favor of a defendant or the government. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 2:37 pm by John Floyd
The difference in the two is as stark as the difference between a Ford F-150 and an 18-wheeler. [read post]
14 May 2010, 7:59 am
Despite somewhat contradictory testimony, the Court credits the officers' belief they were in danger when positioned on Defendant's property. [read post]