Search for: "Little v State"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 26,856
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
The dissent also rips into the majority’s work-for-hire analysis, noting that the key element is the degree of control exercised by the putative employee, and here it was undisputed that Garcia exercised little or no control over the production. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 10:22 am
The case is Hamm v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:51 am
In the case of Avsar v. [read post]
7 May 2011, 8:43 am
” The Appellate Division ruled that “for the reasons stated in Van Donsel v Schrader (supra), we agree with Schrader that he is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 9:06 pm
” Dukes v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:37 pm
The reader does not really get to Justice Wood's actual analysis until the final two pages, which I found a little frustrating. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 4:52 pm
We cite the ever helpful Wikipedia: Apple v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:06 pm
Thirteen states have such laws.The court took up the question in three cases: one from Minnesota and two from North Dakota, which were consolidated for a single argument.In 2013, in Missouri v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:05 am
” Pfaff v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:18 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
” Eight Circuit Holds that Class-Action Waiver in an Arbitration Agreement is Not Unconscionable – In Cicle v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 6:57 am
Many cannabis companies are closely watching the outcome of Gorilla Glue Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 6:51 am
Here is a case that helps understand a little bit about coverage as it relates to auto policies. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 6:21 am
The case was Ildo Perez v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:07 am
Little “Litton” Loan Servicing, LP, et al. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:22 am
See Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:21 am
In the case of North Broward Hospital District v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:15 pm
The court in Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:44 pm
Ross under federal law, and that there was little risk that the Company could be held liable for accommodating his off-job drug use. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:17 am
Floyd LJ noted that he was reminded of a citation from an old case, Savage v Harris and Sons (1896) 13 RPC 364, which stated that “cases, so far as regards the law, are most useful, but when they are applied to particular facts, they, as a rule, are of little service. [read post]
