Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 7581 - 7600 of 178,503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
 According to the Opinion, after the Plaintiff sustained an accidental fire loss to his home and personal property, the carrier denied payment under the insurance policy on the grounds that the Plaintiff did not reside at the subject property and that the Plaintiff and/or the Plaintiffs representatives allegedly provided material misrepresentations to the Defendant-carrier about residency. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:55 pm
Plaintiff settles with the vehicle’s owner, the late driver’s sister, for $20,000. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 10:38 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
A court may decline to hold a defendant responsible even where a plaintiff proves that the defendant’s conduct was the cause-in-fact of the plaintiffs injuries, based on policy considerations and fairness. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:29 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Also, Justice Kagan wrote a separate opinion (joined by the Court's other liberal justices) expressing support for the argument that the proper plaintiffs would have standing to challenge partisan gerrymandering and that such a claim would be justiciable. [read post]
21 May 2020, 12:40 pm by Patrick E. Knie
The defendants removed the plaintiffs action to federal court, in response to which the plaintiff filed a motion to remand the case back to state court. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the Supreme Court's dismissal of Plaintiff's petition.Citing  Matter of Pepin v New York City Dept. of Educ., 148 AD3d 443, the Appellate Division held that DOE:1. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the Supreme Court's dismissal of Plaintiff's petition.Citing  Matter of Pepin v New York City Dept. of Educ., 148 AD3d 443, the Appellate Division held that DOE:1. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:48 am by Arfaa Law Group
In order to recover damages in a Maryland medical malpractice case, the plaintiff must not only prove that the defendant deviated from the standard of care but also that said departure caused the plaintiffs harm. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:38 am
What does one do after the deal works to plaintiff's benefit, where plaintiff successfully ends the criminal and abuse problems and is prepared to walk away from the litigation? [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 10:34 am by Arthur F. Coon
  No one appealed the categorical exemption determination to the Board of Supervisors, although plaintiffs appealed the HPC’s adoption of the COA to the City’s Board of Appeals, which ultimately upheld it. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 7:24 am
Procedural errors and omissions require the remanding the decision terminating plaintiff employees for further consideration Four former employees of the City challenged the City’s terminating their employment. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 9:53 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The jury heard evidence from the plaintiffs expert witness, who testified that the plaintiff would need palliative care. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
This risk stems not only from plaintiff's use of pseudonyms for himself, but also from plaintiff's abundant use of pseudonyms and initials throughout the complaint. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:45 am by Eric B. Meyer
Instead, the comments would be focused on a different employee’s complaints to protect current employees. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 5:39 am
Holy Land Foundation For Relief and Development, No. 05-1815 (12/3/08) the Illinois appellate court found that the district court did not err in granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in action under 18 USC sec. 2333(a) seeking recovery for death of plaintiff's son where defendants allegedly provided financial support to known terrorist (Hamas) who caused death of plaintiff's son. [read post]