Search for: "S. W. v. State"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 14,906
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2014, 5:55 am
State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
[James W. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 7:27 am
Authored by Michael W. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 4:44 am
This morning he released his Opinion in Case C-441/13 Pez Hejduk v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH [available in, amongst others, Italian but not English!] [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 7:30 am
At any rate, though, more artful pleading wouldn’t have saved him; he wasn’t quite “independent” enough from FedEx, his sole client, to bring a viable claim under the state’s unfair business practice statute (Debnam v FedEx Home Delivery, September 8, 2014, Kayatta, W). [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 10:53 am
In Matter of W-G-R- and Matter of M-E-V-G-, The Board held that an applicant seeking asylum based on his or her membership in a “particular social group” must establish that the group is (1) composed of members who share a common immutable characteristic, (2) defined with particularity, and (3) socially distinct within the society in question. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:06 pm
Hilaire, Attorney & Counselor at Law, PLLC, 20 W. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:35 pm
Schkade, W. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:30 pm
In the case, Loving v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
For this reason, and based on authority indicating that Congress has abrogated state sovereign immunity with regard to the FMLA’s family-care provisions, dismissal on this ground was not warranted (Craig v University of Connecticut Health Center, September 3, 2014, Eginton, W). [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
As the Sixth Circuit has explained, “[w]hether a defendant’s particular course of conduct has ceased is irrelevant to the accomplishment of the broader general deterrence function of punitive damages awards. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 5:42 am
State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
” Under Santobello v. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 4:26 am
D.K. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 6:52 am
State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:42 am
Allegations that an employee "typically" worked a 40-hour week and "frequently" worked hours outside of her shift or during meal breaks, standing alone, are not enough to state an overtime claim. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
John W. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm
Morris v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm
Where a federal requirement permits a course of conduct and the state makes it obligatory, the state’s requirement is in addition to the federal requirement and thus is preempted.McMullen v. [read post]
