Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 7581 - 7600 of 10,141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2011, 1:37 am by Melina Padron
Russell KNAGGS and Ramzy KHACHIK v the United Kingdom – 46559/06 [2011] ECHR 1328 (30 August 2011) European Court of Human Rights: refusal to admit intercept evidence in court proceedings not breach of human rights. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
In short, the Korematsu majority’s judicial passivity, in exercising an unduly deferential form of judicial review, greatly damaged constitutional principles. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:29 am by Douglas Melcher
In particular, it has looked to and applied the relatively liberal pleading standard adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Conley v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:51 am by gmlevine
United Business Machines, Inc., D2001-0577 (WIPO June 6, 2001); Government of Canada v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:37 am by Andrew Lustigman
The recent Supreme Court term resulted in a number of very important decisions that will impact companies engaging in advertising and marketing in the United States. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:12 am by Jan Neels
Recognition and proprietary consequences of a UK civil partnership in South Africa The decision in AC v CS 2011 2 SA 360... [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:26 am by John Culhane
It begins with the short preamble, which speaks for “We the People of the United States,” and then states the grand purposes of the Constitution: “in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity…. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
  Federal and State Military Forces of TodayThe United States Armed ForcesThe National GuardState Defense ForcesThe Unorganized Militia  Chapter 5The Right to Arms, Militias, and Slavery in the Early Republic and Antebellum Periods A. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 10:44 am by Lovechilde
United States, federal laws ordering a state to take a specific action actually do violate the Tenth Amendment. [read post]