Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 11,989
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2018, 11:12 am
In ‘Copyright and Information Privacy: Conflicting Rights in Balance’, Federica Giovanella takes us through the regulation of file-sharing in the United States, Canada and Italy to examine its impact on the privacy rights of internet users. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
(Schnatter v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 3:22 am
The plaintiffs contended that because they had completed the swap contracts transactions in the United States, the swap transactions represented “domestic transactions” within the meaning of the “second prong” of the Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm
Options are rights to purchase a specific number of shares of a company’s stock, for a set price (the “exercise price”), within a particular amount of time (usually ten years). [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
Cohen v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am
Gil v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Where companies have the freedom to negotiate more bespoke terms, they would be well advised to seek including a pricing escalation provision to control a vendor’s ability to increase prices over time after the parties have entered into the contract. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:46 am
This year, two cases involved European textbooks which were functionally equivalent to the textbooks being sold in the United States at higher prices. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:41 pm
See Mock v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:34 am
In a case about ABS self-benefitting deals, SEC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 3:23 am
†The Supreme Court rebuffed one such effort in its 2005 Kelo v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
This is because the FTC states that consumers would not switch to mass-market or true luxury handbags “in sufficient volumes to render the price increase unprofitable. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am
These facts are sufficient to state a claim for promissory estoppel.* Multimedia Patent Trust v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:52 am
Individuals purchasing insurance will have a choice of health plans to purchase, which will vary in coverage and price, with all plans having a minimum essential benefits package. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 3:57 pm
But there is a high privacy price to pay for this marginal privacy benefit. mDLs will not just swap in as a 1-on-1 representation of your physical ID. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 12:51 pm
Wall for petitioner (Art Lien) Arguing for Apple, lawyer Daniel Wall told the justices that the iPhone users’ claim is exactly the kind of claim that is prohibited under the Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:50 pm
The lawyers also contended that the Second Circuit ruling contradicts the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
