Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 16,216
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2015, 8:12 am
But the argument in Menominee Indian Tribe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:30 pm
In New York v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:25 pm
Either way, we’re glad funk is still going strong. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 1:02 pm
For instance, in NAACP v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 7:22 am
Nor did Prime state a claim under LMRA Section 303. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm
Dollar General has a strong “nexus” of contacts with the Choctaw Tribe and its jurisdiction. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:29 pm
Reuters tells us that Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu dismissed “any suggestion Ankara should apologize for downing a Russian warplane in its airspace last week, after winning strong NATO support for the right to defend itself. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:24 pm
On the eve of the Obergefell decision [which struck down all state laws banning same-sex marriage in June], thirty-five states and the District of Columbia recognized same-sex marriage, though mainly as a result of lower-court decisions based on implications of the United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 12:35 pm
The answer correctly summarized the state of the law of mixed-motive defenses following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Harris v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Union, Local 371 v City of New York, 2015 NY Slip Op 08658, Appellate Division, First DepartmentUnderlying this case is an arbitration award that ordered the City of New York[City] to reinstate laid-off employees with back pay. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 10:01 pm
All the parties — and there were many in Western Sugar Cooperative, et al. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 10:06 am
The challengers are relying heavily upon a 2000 decision by the Court, Rice v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Powell v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:14 am
Recently, this issue was examined by the court in the case of LH v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 2:12 pm
IVDP then appealed to the General Court on several grounds.The decisionIn Case T‑659/14 IVDP v OHIM (PORT CHARLOTTE) General Court held:“…it is clear that neither the provisions of Regulation No 491/2009, nor those of Regulation No 207/2009, state that the protection under the former must be construed as being exhaustive in the sense that that protection cannot be supplemented, beyond its particular scope, by another system of protection. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:32 pm
In Killon v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 10:20 am
In Pucci v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 6:08 am
Supreme Court in Kewanee Oil Co. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
At the end of October, as part of the China state visit to the UK, the China-Britain Business Council and British Chamber of Commerce in China hosted the third UK-China Intellectual Property Symposium at The Royal Society. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
Here is the petition in White v. [read post]
