Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 9,109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2011, 10:06 am
Although Ellis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm
Or perhaps President Trump was simply “using sarcasm. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:52 am
In 2007, the Court held in Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 12:09 am
Whilst state practice can be found in support (see Filártiga v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 11:57 pm
The Clerk shall close the file.Judge Koh's underlying findings of fact and conclusions of law, however, span 233 pages (this post continues below the document):19-05-21 FTC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 3:29 pm
The opinion also gives useful substantive direction as to the future of the case—and this direction is not friendly to Trump’s efforts to use the courts to slow down the Mar-a-Lago investigation. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:38 am
Supreme Court, In U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm
Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released its opinion in Latif v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 4:04 pm
Yes the Supreme Court’s NFIB v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Ohio 2006) (reducing all studies to one level, and treating all criticisms as though they rendered all studies invalid). 6 Id. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
- Washington v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
., LP v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:51 am
Dahon North America, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 5:06 pm
Once customized, LLM usage by an organization can potentially result in an output that constitutes an invention like those on which thousands of US patents are granted every year. [read post]
7 May 2018, 6:17 am
His point was echoed by Krista Cox, director of public policy initiatives at the Association of Research Libraries, who wrote in Above the Law, “The biggest issue is that CLASSICS extends copyright term for sound recordings beyond what a sound recording today would be granted. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:38 pm
In addition to the “general” misleading advertising provisions, the Competition Act also contains a number of other criminal and civil provisions that prohibit or regulate specific types of marketing practices, including deceptive telemarketing, deceptive prize notices, double ticketing, multi-level marketing, pyramid selling schemes, representations not based on adequate and proper tests, false or misleading ordinary selling price claims, misleading or unauthorized use… [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:08 pm
But in Dolemba v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 5:09 am
Much as this may make advocates sad, Lave’s premise, based on Chancellor Carol McCoy’s decision in Mock v. [read post]
