Search for: "US v. Weekes"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 38,657
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2020, 8:14 am
– Alexis & Doreen The post Useful Info During COVID v.4 appeared first on Law Office of Alexis B. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:51 am
There were also work options ranging from: mini-jobs which paid approximately €450/month; midi-jobs for 16 hours/week; and full-time contracts of 30 hours/week. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Last week, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed their convictions.Writing for the Court in Kelly v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:41 pm
Rassbach pointed to some of the roles described in the court’s 2012 ruling in Hosanna-Tabor Lutheran Church v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 2:11 pm
Related Topics Nagpal v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:05 pm
The post Useful Info During COVID v.3 appeared first on Law Office of Alexis B. [read post]
11 May 2020, 12:12 pm
Over the past two weeks, two decisions on SB 35—both decided by the Honorable Helen E. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:03 am
John Elwood reviews this week’s relists. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am
The first is McGirt v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
In my last post,[1] I praised Lee Mickus’s recent policy paper on amending Rule 702 for its persuasive force on the need for an amendment, as well as a source for helping lawyers anticipate common judicial dodges to a faithful application of the rule.[2] There are multiple dodges used by judicial dodgers, and it behooves litigants to recognize and anticipate them. [read post]
10 May 2020, 6:48 pm
So far, there does not appear to have been any significant decline in filings compared to the same period in the past two years, or at least no decline that can be discerned amid the ‘noise’ of normal week-to-week fluctuations. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
Last Week in the Courts The trial of the data protection case of Greystoke v Financial Conduct Authority which was due to take place On 6 May 2020 the Court of Appeal (Flaux, Popplewell and Dingemans LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Wright v Ver. [read post]
10 May 2020, 1:41 pm
Car that’s late moots plate debate.United States v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 8:18 am
In Roberts v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:05 am
In Ilias and Ahmed v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am
David SchwartzNext week, in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 3:28 am
Decisions this Week India Balu Gopalakrishnan v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
