Search for: "Bodie v Bodie"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 21,354
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2016, 6:01 am
” See Cloutier v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:44 pm
| Friday Fantasies| Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One)| HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio| Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme| Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm
Instead of simply being issued a citation for running a stop sign, Eckert was detained and subjected to to a series of invasive cavity searches and enemas in an ultimately-fruitless search for drugs hidden inside his body. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:51 am
Part IV Chapter II Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (“TULCRA”) as amended by The Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 1995 (SI 1995/2587) (the “1995 Regulations”) TULCRA as originally enacted by Parliament went beyond the requirements of European law under Council Directive 77/187/EEC (now under Council Directive 98/59/EEC) in extending a right to be consulted prior to redundancies to… [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:00 am
Both arguments are bolstered by reference to the €1,250,000 damages award in Leech v Independent Newspapers [2014] IESC 79 (19 December 2014). [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 2:29 am
They then set out the particular utilitarian aspects of the designs, which were to "cover the body, wick away moisture, and withstand the rigors of athletic movements". [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:34 pm
Professor Loewy’s article, United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 11:18 am
In the case of Anderson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 11:18 am
In the case of Anderson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:11 am
Roberts, for example, commented that the uniform is not designed “simply to cover the body. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 4:55 pm
These are decisions that you have a right to make about your own body, regardless of what your insurer may be telling you. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
Wong v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 1:13 pm
Fordham Hill Owners Corp., discussed by us here, for a 37 year old man applying sealer to a floor in an unfinished apartment whose body was engulfed in flames when vapors from the sealing lacquer ignited and caused severe burns over much of his body. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 6:22 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 3:36 am
Cl. 2; Gonzales v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 4:19 am
See, People v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 10:07 am
Maydell, Social Rights and International Law Tafrir Malick Ndiaye, Les droits de l'homme aujourd'hui Ernest Petric, Sovereignty of State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
” In Smith v The City University of New York, 92 NY2d 707, the court said “… a formally chartered entity with officially delegated duties and organizational attributes of a substantive nature . . . should be deemed a public body that is performing a governmental function. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 12:01 am
It would be Silicon Valley Giant v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 2:12 pm
This is somewhat ironic, since during the oral arguments for Bilski v. [read post]
