Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 7601 - 7620 of 16,708
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:50 am by SHG
At Techdirt, Tim Cushing explains decision in United States v. $167,070 in United States Currency: It begins with the flimsiest of “reasonable suspicion” and heads downhill after that. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
 (As Wikipedia explains, a few U.S. states define themselves as “Commonwealths”, rather than “States. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:03 pm
The dissent seemingly discounts this evidence in the record by stating that the only credible evidence shows that CL and JV were hit within seconds after Maher pulled over. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
The discovery obligations with respect to statistician expert witnesses vary considerably among state and federal courts. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:47 am by Jan von Hein
Kern, Judicial protection against torpedo actions In the recent case Weber v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:16 pm by emagraken
In today’s case (No Limits Sportswear Inc v. 0912139 BC Ltd) the Plaintiff sought to read in evidence at trial of their former employee who was questioned at discovery as a representative of the Plaintiff. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:21 am by Quinta Jurecic , Staley Smith
Paul posted about how the Supreme Court’s recent decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
The Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Kitchin, Briggs and Christopher Clarke), at [2015] EWCA Civ 607 , then allowed ConvaTec's appeal and dismissed Smith & Nephew's cross-appeal. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Maybe it’s procedural—cross-examination, understanding the thought process of an unrepresentative consumer. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:35 am
(AP Photo/Susan Walsh) Earlier this morning, the Supreme Court chose to hear Fisher v. [read post]