Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 7601 - 7620 of 12,272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2016, 12:46 pm by Douglas Cantwell
Does loss of effective control of one part of a state allow transit through other parts still controlled by the government, if necessary? [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am by Florian Mueller
Further below you can find a very long list of items in the evidentiary record of Oracle v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 5:47 am
Nor does it exonerate the defendant that his misconduct, which has made necessary the inquiry into the question of harm, renders that inquiry difficult. [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:16 am
That would be a challenge to the scope of the search; I get the sense this defendant conceded that the officer could seize the cell phone as part of search incident, but claimed the exception did not justify searching through the data it contained. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:15 am by Max Kennerly
I’m a civil lawyer, so I’ll set aside criminal law, except to point out that criminal defendants had a mixed bag. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 1:41 am by rainey Reitman
Maryland Turns 35, But Its Health Is Declining, EFF Carpenter v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 5:22 pm by Gregory Forman
When a Defendant can show that the lack of notice was through no fault of his or her own, Rule 60(b)(4) arguably creates a “due process” claim that can be used to vacate the resulting final order. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As Samaha and I observe, the anti-m [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 4:56 pm by Jeff Gamso
I'm all for anything that government does to address the problem of indigent defense. [read post]