Search for: "Herring v. State" Results 7601 - 7620 of 58,078
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm by Jeff Gittins
In 2011, the Utah Supreme Court issued its opinion in the Jensen v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 5:28 am by Barsumian Armiger
State affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the State of Indiana and the Indiana Department of Transportation (collectively “INDOT”) finding INDOT immune from liability in a lawsuit brought by Tracy Ladra (“Ladra”), who suffered injuries when her vehicle hydroplaned on a flooded portion of I-94. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
  The 2008 term featured the former, with big decisions like Herring v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 12:15 am
Two years after the Delaware Supreme Court's momentous decision in Smith v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
Van Colle (administrator of the estate of GC (deceased)) and another (Original-Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) Smith (Respondent) v Chief Constable of Sussex Police (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 50 (30 July 2008) Caldarelli (Appellant) v Court of Naples (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 51 (30 July 2008) R (on the application… [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 5:40 pm
The Court of Appeals further held that section 193 of the Labor Law did not prevent the parties from entering into a contract where a commission was not "earned" until after certain deductions were made from her percentage of gross billings.The answers provided by the Court of Appeals worked to the detriment of an executive who, upon leaving her company, sued it for making certain purportedly unlawful dcductions.The decision in Pachter v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 In People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326, the court ruled that under both state and federal law any statement made under the threat of dismissal from one's position is protected by the privilege against self-incrimination and is “automatically immunized from use in criminal proceedings. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:34 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]