Search for: "Key v State"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 22,474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am
(IPKat) United States US General US signs ACTA (Ars Technica) KEI comment on US signing of ACTA (KEI) Private federal civil actions for trade secret infringement (Patently-O) US Patent Reform Big laws, small businesses: what will be the AIA’s impact (IP finance) Sarnoff: Derivation and prior art problems with the new patent act (Patently-O) America Invents Act: How the new law impacts your clients and your patent practice, part 2 (Patent Law Practice… [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 10:14 am
ShareSanchez v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 4:07 pm
(United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 6:28 am
Murder in Mississippi : United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:44 pm
Project applicants can use TMUD credits alongside other various local, state and federal credits and incentives to attain financing necessary to complete their projects. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
For example, in Phillips v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
He also defends companies in state consumer protection investigations and data breach responses. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:33 pm
Kingsley v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am
Voting RightsThe Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 3:55 pm
Ward v LB Haringey. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 1:58 am
It profiles the main Supreme Court Justice responsible for the consequential Wyoming v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:46 am
But see, United States Fidelity & Guarantee Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 6:18 am
(see State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:45 am
Key Bank Nat. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
The latter is a key point considering the recently made Mio CJEU referral [IPKat here and here]. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 9:18 am
Saji v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:35 am
State ex rel Elvis Presley v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:35 pm
In Apple v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:28 pm
Notably, Professor Hoeppner represented complainants against Google in the DG COMP investigation that resulted in the Google Shopping decision.When the Supreme Court of the United States allowed the Pepper v. [read post]
