Search for: "Levell v. State"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 29,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2019, 4:28 pm
Notably, in 2010, the Supreme Court held in Samantar v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:04 pm
In State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:21 pm
” Hawaii Stevedores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 2:11 pm
The law is an anticipatory move by Illinois in the event the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 1:25 pm
These flaws likely will not be evident to reporters from the trial record (which is another reason to be cautious when covering trials up front), but typically will arise in appellate arguments down the line.Failing to disclose exculpatory evidence: Brady v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:56 am
No state law can require food to bear a warning that violates federal law. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:56 am
No state law can require food to bear a warning that violates federal law. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Hans v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:43 am
§ 3156) in United States of American v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 9:21 am
See, e.g., Bloodworth v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:40 am
The Supreme Court has already directly borrowed this principle in analyzing the scope of congressional contempt power, stating in Anderson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:26 am
Justice Thomas with opinion in Parker Drilling v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 5:02 am
We cite Rumsfeld v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
What the court and the parties neglected to mention is that the Patent Act explicitly states that a refusal to license does not constitute patent “misuse or illegal extension of the patent. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:11 pm
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes noted in Biddle v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:04 am
“The Limited Engagement Letter and Legal Malpractice” — “One hires an attorney to handle a case and expects that the attorney will handle the entire case at a level of good practice to which a competent attorney should adhere. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:52 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York State… [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:59 am
At the substantive level, the Product Liability Directive – adopted in 1985 – is the only piece of legislation harmonising the laws of the Member States. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
United States. [read post]
