Search for: "Light v. United States" Results 7601 - 7620 of 11,342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2024, 10:03 pm by Josh Blackman
United States, 411 U.S. 526, 541, 93 S.Ct. 1702, 1711, 36 L.Ed.2d 472 (1973); Fortson v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:43 am by Steve Hall
The New Jersey Supreme Court appointed a Special Master to review the legal standard for the admissibility of eyewitness testimony known as the “Manson test,” established by the United States Supreme Court in 1977 and fully embraced by 48 out of 50 states, including New Jersey in 1988 in State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:00 am by Tejinder Singh
  The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Vasquez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
They argued that their clients shouldn’t have to pay taxes (United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  By way of background, the publisher filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 23, 2011, against eBook publisher, Open Road Integrated Media. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-10639, asking whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with retroactivity rules when new precedent changes the law after briefing. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:17 am by Susan Brenner
The Court does not address here whether the ECPA applies to documents stored or acts occurring outside of the United States. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:52 am by Maxwell Kennerly
" The normal rule in the United States is that "posthumous birth" results in the child being treated the same as if they had been alive at the time of the parent's death. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Cari Rincker
  This is the first law of its kind in the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Department or Homeland Security issued a “National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS) Bulletin,” warning of, “a heightened threat environment across the United States,” and, “violent riots have continued in recent days,” and, “ideologically-motivated actors” could incite further violence. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm by Michael O'Brien
Today, the writ is somewhat different, it protects individuals who 1) are confined by judges who apply rules contrary to the Constitution of the United States as determined by the U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm by Bexis
We disagree.In Hoffman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit applied Pennsylvania law and concluded that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find that the manufacturer failed to adequately test its drug to discover potentially harmful side-effects. [read post]