Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 7601 - 7620 of 16,585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2021, 2:32 pm by Eugene Volokh
Fox News Network, LLC, written by Third Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas (sitting by designation in District Court): News outlets are not liable for minor mistakes, especially when reporting on public figures and matters of public concern. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:04 am by Seán Binder
Blinken’s comment marks a change in emphasis compared to recent months. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 706(2), confines judicial review of agency action to a specific list of errors—a court may set aside agency actions that are: (A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law;  … (C) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; (D) without observance of procedure required by law; … Section 706(2) is famously deferential to agencies, but it doesn’t insulate… [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 11:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Maybe people don’t like it when other people buy counterfeits, but maybe that doesn’t matter (John Stuart Mill again!). [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
The "ultimate allegation" in Twombly didn't even purport to be based on any fact. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
Twitter has also responded as a business matter with a so-called "verified account" program for public figures. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:29 am by Persuasion Strategies
Rather than simply importing and applying the baseline attitudes they brought in the courthouse door, those individuals who are selected become "jurors" and that role can mark them internally as surely as the sticky badge marks them externally. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:37 pm by Ryan
Readership in the blogosphere wasn’t particularly high, but Occhiogrosso gradually realized that didn’t matter. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 1:03 pm by Morris Turek
The fact of the matter is that LegalZoom would have done nothing to dissuade my potential client from filing his trademark application. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:50 pm by Andrew Koppelman
They may be, but why does it matter? [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:15 am by Steve Baird
It doesn't matter who the owner or coach is, or who the players are on the field, I simply can't be a fan of the NFL team in our Nation's capital; I can't get past the brand name, since the dictionary confirms it embodies a racial slur. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 9:49 am by Buce
 Broader issues include, one, what happened to the still-missing cell-phone; two, why that matters (if it does matter) and three, how, if it all, can you tie all this back to the Sarkozy regime? [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  Even if you don't own Apple stock (I don't), this matters to users of Apple products because it helps Apple to retain its best employees, who receive a significant portion of their income through stock options that vest over time. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:44 am by Wells Bennett
 The lawyer hasn’t filed a written motion, but finds the matter urgent enough to warrant discussion now. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 11:11 pm by Carolyn Elefant
 But here, I don’t find this disclaimer – or at least some kind of caveat stating that the cases are “representative” matters – entirely unreasonable or unduly burdensome on the First Amendment. [read post]