Search for: "Matter of Robert T"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 10,572
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2011, 4:10 am
We're saying we don't care because it doesn't matter to us. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
“[T]he remedy imposed by a court of equity should be commensurate with the violation. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:14 pm
No matter the kind of law you practice, a person walks into your office. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:59 pm
Don't mislead the public. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:40 am
Don't forget our discount (see right-hand side panel): Research Methodologies in EU and International Law Robert Cryer, Tamara Hervey and Bal Sokhi-Bulley, with Alexandra Bohm Law research students often begin their PhDs without having an awareness of methodology, or the opportunity to think about the practice of research and its theoretical implications. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:27 am
Robert McDonnell says job creation is the best way to raise tax revenue and pay for services. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:19 am
This could promote government censorship of corporate speech, precisely what the Supreme Court said in CU the First Amendment didn’t permit. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:13 pm
If you do that, I believe you will begin to understand how legal scholarship matters. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:36 pm
” Atchison, T. [read post]
22 May 2011, 6:14 am
But… I can’t tell you what it is about. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:36 pm
Decides to remain seized of the matter. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:03 pm
Robert Hughes, Jr. [read post]
20 May 2011, 8:47 am
– This week the SEC and Tenaris resolved their FCPA matter by entering into a deferred prosecution agreement – the first for the SEC. [read post]
20 May 2011, 6:37 am
, would have been #6 but is listed along with this one because of its close relation.)Robert Merges, As Many As Six Impossible Patents Before Breakfast: Property Rights for Business Concepts and Patent System Reform (Berkeley Tech. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:03 pm
Are we to take seriously the absurdity of Chief Justice Roberts's notion of the judge as the naive "umpire"? [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:37 am
While it may be true the Ranger didn't have the information before the raid, it appears he made no effort to get it; at least we know by April 13 he'd figured out how to get that information, and I see no reason the same tactics couldn't have been applied in the days before the raid.Whether the failure to follow up with available investigative tactics was "reckless" is a matter for the court, but IMO it's just another example of the… [read post]
19 May 2011, 12:20 am
[Snip]Gee, what's the matter? [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:13 pm
That’s what this is all about isn’t it? [read post]
18 May 2011, 11:54 am
Roberts, Jr. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:12 am
In the Microsoft Corp. v. i4i, the Supreme Court must determine whether the burden of proof for parties alleging patent invalidity should be changed from a clear and convincing standard to a preponderance of the evidence standard. [read post]
