Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 7601 - 7620 of 178,503
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2023, 8:43 am
Today's advance release family law opinion: Anderson-Harris v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 8:31 am by Friedman & Houlding LLP
  In its motion, SCA claims that Plaintiff Dragon signed an acknowledgement that he had received the company’s employee handbook, and that the handbook contained language requiring that employment disputes be arbitrated. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 8:28 am by Joshua Lloyd
The borrower’s maneuver could also be manifested in a cross-motion to plaintiffs motion to discontinue the foreclosure. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 7:57 am by Allan Blutstein
.) -- dismissing complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because underlying FOIA requests were not submitted by plaintiff, but by its attorney, who failed to clearly indicate that the requests were submitted on behalf of his client; rejecting attorney’s assignment of his FOIA rights to plaintiff for jurisdictional purposes because it occurred eight months after the lawsuit was filed. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 7:24 am by David M. Boertje
It means that either the plaintiff or someone on the prosecution team is literally out to get you. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 7:00 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Medical malpractice claims are very serious, even if plaintiffs fully recover. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 6:55 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Where “application of the operation-of-law exception would bar a vicarious liability claim that is timely filed within the [HCLA’s] extended statute of limitations solely because the statute of limitations had expired for any claims against the principal’s agents, the exception must give way to the [HCLA]. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 6:13 am by Eugene Volokh
That standard demands that the plaintiff produce "sufficient evidence to permit the conclusion that the defendant in fact entertained serious doubts as to the truth of [the defendant's] publication. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Concluding that the district court should not have granted Plaintiffs motion to unseal the award," the Circuit Court of Appeals remanded the matter to the federal district court "with instructions to dismiss the petition as moot" and reversed the district court's ruling unsealing the award.* Plaintiff had signed the separation agreement in exchange for "severance payments and other benefits. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Concluding that the district court should not have granted Plaintiffs motion to unseal the award," the Circuit Court of Appeals remanded the matter to the federal district court "with instructions to dismiss the petition as moot" and reversed the district court's ruling unsealing the award.* Plaintiff had signed the separation agreement in exchange for "severance payments and other benefits. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff commenced an action against NYCHA claiming that it was negligent in failing to maintain the door in a reasonably safe condition After the defendant commenced the action on plaintiffs behalf, NYCHA moved todismiss the action due to plaintiffs failure to timely file a notice of claim.1 The motion was granted. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
["[T]he fate of Plaintiff's claims hinges to some extent on the truth or falsity of Defendant's statements regarding Plaintiff's conviction of a crime. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:58 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
He also challenged the lower court’s ruling on his children’s extraordinary expenses, including tutoring, camps, sports, and other extracurricular activities. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:56 am by Unknown
Chamber of Commerce argue that the Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower statute requires the plaintiff to prove the employer’s retaliatory intent. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:45 am by Eric B. Meyer
Maybe consider doing that after you finish this blog post and see what’s up — before a plaintiffs lawyer beats you to it. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Roy, (D CO, filed 8/16/2023) alleges that plaintiffs' free exercise and free speech rights were infringed by conditions that did not allow giving preference to Catholic families. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
  Plaintiffs' son was denied a religious exemption by the principal and vice-principal of the son's school at the direction of the state commissioner of education. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Plaintiffs argued the new districts plainly do not meet the court’s standards, and Republicans were engaging in political gamesmanship by ignoring the court and drawing lines that would still only present Black voters the opportunity to elect the candidate of their choosing in one district. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:15 am by Meredith Ervine
It’s worth noting that the plaintiffs claimed that the first 13D amendment and related Form 144 were also misleading. [read post]