Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 21,157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2014, 8:29 am
State Department.Better than a change to the CPIA would be a record keeping law that brings integrity to the purchase and sale of ancient coins. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:36 am
However, the standard for the two motions is the same: a complaint "'must state sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.'" Ashcroft v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:20 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:31 am
Justice Steigmann authored an opinion that built upon his special concurrence two years ago in Lifetec, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 11:25 am
From Silvester v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:47 am
Kelly v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 9:32 am
Paragraph 59 of the complaint states as follows: 59. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:32 am
However, the court stated that if the investor could fashion the claim to circumvent SLUSA preemption, a claim for restitution of the fees paid the company could be recovered as restitution.The March 8 decision is Smit v. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 11:33 am
One would assume the first sale doctrine would also apply to legally purchased digital property, however, in the 2018 case Capitol Records, LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:53 pm
DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. 22-252Issue: Whether, under Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 8:58 am
You don’t pay the state the sales tax directly. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:49 pm
That this power is exercised in the context of an intellectual property claim should not obscure the profound state interference in the process of social identification, affiliation, and differentiation that post-sale confusion doctrine represents. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 1:15 pm
v=RYHUwD7vU_4 TRANSCRIPT – My name is Page Pate, and I’m a lawyer who practices Constitutional Law and Criminal Defense in Federal Court. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 4:59 am
Pactiv Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 5:13 pm
Aronson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:13 pm
Div., Inc., 442 F.3d 919, 929-33 (5th Cir. 2006) (state law duty to train medical personnel in use of PMA device preempted as state requirement additional to FDA regulatory scheme). [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 6:28 pm
The Florida appeals court ruled that collateral estoppel did not apply to completely bar the former employee’s civil claim, but that the trial court should not have dismissed the claim without conducting an evidentiary hearing on the stand-your-ground immunity claim (Professional Roofing and Sales, Inc v Flemmings). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 3:11 am
Lord Briggs and Lord Sales reject this. [read post]
13 May 2024, 9:06 pm
” “In addition, this bill could further increase receipts to the State General Fund from civil penalties (ranging from $100 for a Class II violation up to $10,000 for a Class V violation), imposed on food sales establishments that violate the provisions of this bill. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
”Not only could the state legitimately regulate sales of securities, proponents argued; it should. [read post]
