Search for: "Smith v Smith" Results 7601 - 7620 of 14,499
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2010, 5:31 am
Co. v Smith Co., 46 NY2d 498, 504 [1979]; Solomon v Consolidated Resistance Co. of Am., 97 AD2d 791, 792 [1983]). [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 7:04 pm
 Here is the link to the 1999 11th Circuit Opinion detailing more of former Broward prosecutor Robert Carney's  malfeasance;And here is a pertinent part of the decision copied from the Broward Blog: :Purvis v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Weintraub v Petervary  2017 NY Slip Op 51595(U)  Decided on November 16, 2017 Appellate Term, Second Department is an example of how lower courts over-determine cases in favor of the attorney and to the detriment of the client. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:26 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Importantly, Supreme Court credited the father's testimony that, were he to become the primary custodial parent, he would allow the mother free and frequent access to the child and, finding no basis in the record to disagree, the court declines to disturb the court's determination in that regard as in Matter of Smith v Smith. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 10:13 am
This is only from the Reed Smith side of the blogWe’ve just received today’s decision by the Supreme Court of Iowa in Huck v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” In Smith v The City University of New York, 92 NY2d 707, the court said “… a formally chartered entity with officially delegated duties and organizational attributes of a substantive nature . . . should be deemed a public body that is performing a governmental function. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Newman v City of Tonawanda 2022 NY Slip Op 03834 Decided on June 10, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:45 am by Neil Wilkof
This was based on the Australian case of of Smith Kline & French Laboratories (Aust) Limited v Secretary, Department of Community Services and Health (1990) 22 FCR 73. [read post]