Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 7601 - 7620 of 21,971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2017, 10:32 am by Schachtman
A few other occupations were included; in all their were hundreds of independent analyses, without any adjustment for multiple testing. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 9:13 am by Christopher Simon
A week before the plaintiff’s accident, the elevator company had performed its five-year safety test, which took 1-2 days per car. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 7:23 am by John McFarland
He co-founded ShaleTest, offering to conduct testing of air and water around oil and gas sites. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:08 pm by Ad Law Defense
  Plaintiffs’ attorneys in California have decided to put that question to the test. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:08 pm by Ad Law Defense
  Plaintiffs’ attorneys in California have decided to put that question to the test. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 11:45 am
 All alongside more pedestrian matters like whether a particular plaintiff is entitled to social security disability payments.So there's something for everyone today. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:05 am by Guest and Gray Law Firm
The first prong of the gross negligence test focuses on the objective nature of the defendant’s conduct. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:59 am by Slappey & Sadd, LLC
If the defendant’s actions meet this test, then he or she can be sued for any actions in the state. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  Essentially, the plaintiff should live in a different state than the corporate headquarters or principle place of business. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:04 pm by Barry Barnett
Certification Judge Rakoff granted the plaintiffs’ motion to certify the case as a class action for damages. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:17 am by Schachtman
As a result, there will not be another test of plaintiffs’ claims that talc causes ovarian cancer, and the previous Slemp case will remain an important event to interpret. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 7:57 am by Eric Goldman
Perhaps a future challenge will test this issue more squarely, but this opinion looks exactly the same as it would have looked pre-Packingham. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:17 pm by daniel
These tactics present a compelling need for deterrence and to discourage exploitative litigation by patentees who have no intention of testing the merits of their claims. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 1:10 pm by Salvi, Schostok & Pritchard P.C.
Further, ordering fewer medical tests would put patients at risk and mean a possibility of even more medical errors being made. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 11:51 am by Eugene Volokh
However, this case is not about whether Plaintiffs expressed themselves through conduct. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 11:44 am by Kevin C. Ford, Trial Lawyer
Both test groups subsequently suffered from the ailments; however, because both retinopathy and neuro-developmental impairment are consistent with injuries associated with extremely low birth-weight infants, the plaintiffs were unable to show that it was their participation in the study, and not their premature births and low birth-weight, that caused their injuries. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 9:35 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
That is, it could find that the DOL generally has the authority to impose a salary-level test, but that the Final Rule exceeded that authority. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:07 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
Administrator’s Interpretation No. 2016-1, issued January 20, 2016, advised that the test for joint employment uses the same expansive “suffer or permit to work” language found in the FLSA—“the broadest definition that has ever been included in any one act,” as the Supreme Court observed. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 11:23 am by corynne
Recognizing the First Amendment interests at stake, these tests require plaintiffs to establish the legitimacy of their claims and their need for the information. [read post]