Search for: "Head v State"
Results 7621 - 7640
of 14,437
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Cooper, in his May 29, 2014 decision in Ponorovskaya v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 10:19 am
The State allows officers to demand a driver give blood if they refused to take a breathalyzer test. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 9:21 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 7:09 am
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:23 am
Rakoff’s rejection in 2011 of the consent settlement in United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:17 am
In Hubner v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 1:23 am
v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
The Harris Court cited, with approval, a 2002 traumatic cancer case, State ex rel. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 2:30 pm
People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
The second Ordinance seeks to amend the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act passed by Parliament earlier this year to carve out India’s 29th State- Telangana from the erstwhile undivided State of Andhra Pradesh.[2] This Ordinance makes certain amendments to the territories covered by the Khammam district under this State bifurcation law. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 9:26 pm
In Peek v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:05 am
The premiere issue features a Symposium on the Target breach, FTC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:30 am
If it does not “ ‘give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice’ ” of its scope, United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Judge Berzon wants to know, too.United States v. [read post]
SYNTHETIC DRUG BUSTS: FEDERAL ARRESTS FOR FAKE POT AND DESIGNER DRUGS THAT ARE LEGAL UNDER STATE LAW
31 May 2014, 1:34 pm
Under the CSA, there are five classification schedules (Schedules I – V) for their regulation, with Schedule I being the most restrictive and Schedule V the least. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:36 am
Earlier this week, I blogged about Hall v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 5:00 am
The upshot is that any plaintiff pursuing failure-to-warn claims involving rhabdomyolysis and Lipitor faces a very steep uphill battle, and such was the case in Miller v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:22 pm
While the North Carolina Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 6:56 am
In this case, the Supreme Court resolves two clashing principles: the right to speak your mind and protest before government officials, and the need to protect the President of the United States from assassination.The case is Wood v. [read post]
