Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 7621 - 7640 of 18,114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2016, 10:50 am by Bill Amadeo
  In essence, the court ruled that if a defendant has been rehabilitated and they were a minor when a non-homicide occurred, the case can be re-examined.1  In a majority opinion, Justice Kennedy stated, The Constitution prohibits the imposition of a life without parole sentence on a juvenile offender who did not commit homicide. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 12:46 pm
 Once we're there, it seems more important to me to expand upon the analysis rather than a (somewhat distracting) discourse on the particular path through which we wound up in our present predicament. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
(Indian Child Welfare Act – Placement)In re Isaiah W. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm by familoo
We have seen the Northern Irish Supreme Court Justice Lord Kerr suggesting that Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ought to be directly applicable, and the Supreme Court applying it in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47 (8 July 2015). [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 5:23 am by SHG
I should note that, in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 10:22 am by Nora Ellingsen
The commission needs to decide whether the form, in connection with the letter, constitutes a voluntary waiver, but unfortunately, they’re having issues translating the letter in a timely fashion. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:36 am by Dan Tench and Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
[We’re] talking about 14 years of grappling with it because it was such a difficult area. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 3:48 am by SHG
There is bad law, terrible law, like Graham v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
” Mr Economou was refused permission to appeal but will re-apply directly to the Court of Appeal. [read post]