Search for: "MATTER OF P S" Results 7621 - 7640 of 18,883
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2015, 10:06 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Dan Burk's work should already be familiar to those who follow patentable subject matter debates (see, e.g., here, here, and here). [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
`We will continue to work with our private sector partners to solve these 21st century heists and bring the perpetrators, no matter where in the world they may hide, to justice. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Faley, Pope’s New Rule on Annulment: Will the Law Keep Up? [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am by Daniel Hemel
If the latter, then presumably the Supreme Court would take up the matter. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am by Daniel Hemel
If the latter, then presumably the Supreme Court would take up the matter. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am by Daniel Hemel
If the latter, then presumably the Supreme Court would take up the matter. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 4:02 am by Betty Lupinacci
What piqued my interest, in addition to statements from various sports notables such as Branch Rickey, Joe Cronin, George P. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 7:44 am by Lax & Neville LLP
Lax & Neville LLP has nationally represented small broker-dealers, financial services professionals and securities industry companies in regulatory matters and securities-related and commercial litigation. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
 As USCIS forecasted in November 2014 (Item 4 in its list), the forthcoming interpretation would “[p]rovide clarity on adjustment [of status] portability [in order] to remove unnecessary restrictions on natural career progression and general job mobility [and] provide relief to workers facing lengthy adjustment delays. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 12:31 pm
Specifically, Master Arbitrator Dachs found that, among other things, Arbitrator Felensten's award was incorrect as a matter of law as a provider's participation in an improper fee sharing agreement is not a valid ground to deny said provider's claim for no-fault benefits. [read post]