Search for: "R v. E" Results 7621 - 7640 of 15,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2009, 3:12 am
Wal-Mart Stores E., LP, 930 A.2d 881 (Del. 2007), quoting Koutoufaris v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 10:33 am by uwlegalscholarship
Please send all questions and article submissions by e-mail to: Morena Carter, Editor-in-Chief, Akron Law Review, lawreview [at] uakron.edu. mw [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:02 am
More extensive proof is needed to be deemed a well-known mark (Novelty Pte Ltd v Amanresorts Ltd and another [2009] 3 SLR(R) 216 (“Amanresorts”) at [233]). [read post]
28 Feb 2006, 11:42 pm
It ruled that Dial-A-Mattress could establish secondary meaning in connection with its application for the mark 1-888-M-A-T-R-E-S-S, based upon the acquired distinctiveness of its legally equivalent mark (212) M-A-T-T-R-E-S (shown above). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am by Kelly
Phoenix Fence Company (Docket Report) District Court E D Pennsylvania: False marking intent to deceive cannot be inferred from knowledge of the limited duration of patents and expiration of marked patents: Hollander v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
., Inc. v County of Montgomery, 2008 NY Slip Op 09519, Decided on December 4, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentCathy Anderson and Grace De Waal Malefyt each worked for a period of time in the title of "part-time" correction officer in Montgomery County. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:50 am
This term, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case of Gould v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:27 pm by Steven G. Pearl
The United States Supreme Court yesterday issued its decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 4:47 am
Slipping and falling as the result of an undetectable unknown substance on road constitutes an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law Sammon v DiNapoli, 2012 NY Slip Op 05587, Appellate Division, Third Department City of Yonkers Firefighter Michael M. [read post]