Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 7621 - 7640
of 10,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2011, 1:50 am
However, in the United Kingdom at any rate, it appears that there is some good news. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm
Euroflex Ltd (Afro-IP) United Kingdom Goodwill, badwill – read all about it! [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 8:19 am
Beginning on Feb. 20, 2011, the United States Navy and the FBI began negotiating with the pirates to secure the release of the hostages. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm
As a result, the Patent Reform Act as a whole will not please any of the groups entirely, but is a compromise bill designed to please enough to ensure passage while invigorating the United States patent system. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:00 am
Legal Writing Pro Ross Guberman offers an analysis of Wal-Mart’s brief in the recent United States Supreme Court case Wal-Mart v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:25 am
A. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:05 am
§ 292) is constitutional under the “Appointments” and “Take Care” clauses of the United States Constitution (Article II, Sections 2 and 3). [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
See Stanger v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:50 am
The end of the Supreme Court’s 2010-2011 term was marked in part by a series of recent developments and revelations highlighting the dire state of the Supreme Court, an institution that should be a fair and impartial forum for justice. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:42 am
Lis v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
Constitutional meaning is hotly contested in the United States today. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:43 am
Langdell was a United States resident and the first and second defendant companies were incorporated in the United States. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Roth v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
(Class 99) (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC (Ch): Plane users can’t tell airlines from airways: United Airlines Inc v United Airways Limited (IPKat) PPC page 32: Quickstep – are there difficulties changing course with 8 tentacles? [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 1:49 pm
The Seventh Circuit’s opinion last week in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 10:32 am
Marianne Bowler used the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
You can now add to the court’s good precedent United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:13 pm
Supreme Court in Bullcoming v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
The new false marking statute will limit lawsuits to being filed only by the government or those that can show a competitive injury from the false marking: (1) IN GENERAL- Section 292 of title 35, United States Code, is amended– (A) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following: ‘Only the United States may sue for the penalty authorized by this subsection. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
In that case, Lord Shaw described how open justice was ‘a sound and very sacred part of the constitution of the country and the administration of justice. . .The principle is equally embedded into the framework of all common law systems; not least the United States, where, in 1791, it was enshrined as a constitutional right by the 6th amendment. [read post]
