Search for: "Burden v. Burden"
Results 7641 - 7660
of 31,121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2017, 12:59 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 3:15 am
Unique Motorcars v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 10:52 am
State v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:00 am
In Valero v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:59 am
Whistle blowingKahn v SUNY Health Center at Brooklyn, 288 AD2d 350 What is the whistle blower required to show in order to prevail? [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 2:06 pm
Straub v Sallie Mae 2010 WL 3297057 (Bankr.D.S.C.) [read post]
28 May 2010, 12:28 pm
Matter of Richard Benedetto v Thomas DiNapoli, as State Comptroller This Article 78 appeal was brought about to review a determination of the Comptroller denying petitioner his application for accidental disability retirement benefits. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:46 am
On October 9, 2009, the California Court of Appeals issued a decision in Nazir v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 3:30 pm
Entegris (Mykrolis) v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
Casey‘s “undue burden” standard or Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 3:06 am
Inasmuch as defendants failed to shift the burden to plaintiff [*3]to demonstrate a departure from the standard of care, the motion for summary judgment should have been denied (see Suppiah v Kalish, 76 AD3d 829, 832 [2010]; Ehlinger v Ruberti, Girvin & Ferlazzo, 304 AD2d at 927; Estate of Nevelson v Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & Cuiffo, 259 AD2d 282, 284 [1999]). [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 10:57 pm
Gustafson-Feis, at 1085, quoting Dowdy v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 1:55 pm
In Case C-244/00 Van Doren + Q GmbH v Lifestyle + Sportswear Handelsgesellschaft mbH [2003] ETMR 75, the Court of Justice of the European Communities (as it then was) fixed the burden of proof on the alleged infringer, unless that party could demonstrate that the effect of that burden was to enable the trade mark owner to partition the single market, in which case the burden would shift to the trade mark owner. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
And further dispute arose between Sheeran's song 'Photograph' (also written by the first and third claimants; Sheeran and McDaid) and a song called 'Amazing', following which there was a settlement agreement and 35% of the PRS royalties now go to the writers of 'Amazing'.Naturally, the Claimants sought to strike out these allegations, which came before Deputy Master Jefferis on 4 June 2019 on the basis that similar fact evidence is only admissible in civil… [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:51 am
As Lord Toulson pointed out, this is undoubtedly a “heavy burden”. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am
Nicklin J at first instance in ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2019] EWHC 970 (QB)). [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 10:51 am
In Muniz v. [read post]
