Search for: "Green v. Green" Results 7641 - 7660 of 8,873
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2022, 4:09 am by Bill Marler
HAV is a communicable (or contagious) disease that often spreads from person to person.[11] Person-to-person transmission occurs via the “fecal-oral route,” while all other exposure is generally attributable to contaminated food or water.[12] Food-related outbreaks are usually associated with contamination of food during preparation by a HAV-infected food handler.[13] The food handler is generally not ill because the peak time of infectivity—that is, when the most… [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Beginning with the landmark 1938 decision in Erie v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
The Justice and Security Bill, following a green paper, will allow (a limited use) of closed proceedings in national security proceedings [MoJ release - PDF] which has raised widespread concern. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
Research & resources The Law, Terrorism and the Right to Know project at University of Reading has set up a page tracking developments and commentary around the government’s Justice and Security Green Paper, which proposes legislation that will change how evidence is managed in civil proceedings and inquests, prompting concerns about secret legal hearings. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While Lessig treats Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm by Larry
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
” The motion cites the 2001 California Supreme Court Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 11:00 pm by Hayleigh Bosher
NFTs can be stolenNFTs can be stolen - they are only as secure as the digital wallet they are stored in – as was the fate of Seth Green's Bored Ape. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
That ruling--and especially the opinion of then-Court President Aharon Barak--has sometimes been called the Marbury v. [read post]