Search for: "Hand v. State"
Results 7641 - 7660
of 30,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2021, 5:27 pm
Ripeness, the matter at hand, asks two questions. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 4:28 pm
This point was recently driven home in the June, 2014 Miami, Florida case, United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:29 am
" In People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:20 am
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama granted summary judgment to the NSBA in National Small Business United v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 1:41 pm
As a result, because copyright ownership was an essential first determination in the matter at hand, the Copyright Act's three-year statute of limitations applied, barring the claim, even though the applicable state statute of limitations had not expired.More detail of Cambridge Literary Props., Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:58 pm
The case cite is Righthaven LLC v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:38 am
State v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 1:52 pm
Judge Walker has ordered that the stay of entry of judgment in Perry v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 3:50 pm
nl_pk=44e1cfe8-1d78-4c79-ab63-b190fb389cc8&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=competition. [3] FTC et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 4:40 pm
I blogged about US v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:49 am
Take too heavy a hand in providing state funds to religious schools and the state may encroach on the establishment clause. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
In Davenport v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:41 am
" in Gall v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:30 am
Chevron deference has long been a prime target of conservative opponents of the “administrative state,” and they scored a big victory with the SCOTUS’s 2022 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:42 pm
Freedom Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 2:15 pm
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Rockland, however, moved to dismiss Clifford’s complaint as barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel, citing the dismissal of her claims against it in an earlier federal action she had brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.* Clifford, on the other hand, claimed that her State action should go forward because the Federal District Court had declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over her State law… [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 8:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 8:11 am
” I think that under Southland Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 2:05 pm
This morning the Court issued its decision in Maracich v. [read post]
