Search for: "People v Justice A."
Results 7641 - 7660
of 23,094
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 11:42 am
On Tuesday, the Wisconsin Supreme Court (somewhat reluctantly) ruled against a man who had a faulty Medtronic defibrillator upholding Riegel v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
Din, arguing that allowing judicial review of consular decisions “would play a dual role, providing people access to some form of justice and creating a way to confront flaws in a system designed to protect us from dangerous things. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 11:45 am
In 2017, the ACLU and the law firm of Covington & Burling filed Collins v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 7:22 pm
Here is the opinion, Rhodes v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 7:19 pm
This morning brought the first opinion from Justice Neil Gorsuch, explaining the decision of a unanimous court in Henson v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:04 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:24 am
I am particularly puzzled by Justice Breyer’s concern that people won’t recognize that oral arguments are only a part of the Court’s work. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
January 9, 2009 PRELIMINARY MEMORANDUM OF THE JUSTICE ROBERT H. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 1:25 pm
Olmstead v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:36 pm
Board of Education and at least explain whether Roe v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 8:42 am
Supreme Court in Hill v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:11 pm
Written by Dr Meng Yu and Dr Guodong Du, co-founders of China Justice Observer Key takeaways: Despite the fact that the elaboration of a judicial interpretation appears to have been put on hold, China’s Supreme People’s Court has now resorted to conference summaries, which are not legally binding but have a practical impact, to express its views in recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:06 am
The leading case seems to be Maryland Shall Issue v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:54 am
Courts have, at times, been hesitant to take judicial notice of the systemic and background factors affecting Aboriginal people in Canadian society (see, e.g., R. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 1:28 pm
In 2012, in Miller v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 10:00 am
Justice Gorsuch relied on the "diverse" range of briefs: If the multitude of amicus briefs before us proves one thing, it is that the American people are still at it. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:06 am
Referring to the 2010 ruling in Holder v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am
In Nelson v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:39 pm
See People v. [read post]
