Search for: "People v. House" Results 7641 - 7660 of 12,873
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2019, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
In 2018, we had a series of posts on the Government’s cancellation of Part 2 of the Leveson Inquiry. the failed attempt by the House of Lords to reintroduce the inquiry in the Data Protection Bill and the unsuccessful application for judicial review of the cancellation decision. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner has lauded the judgment, saying protecting the privacy rights of “people (who) may not even be aware those rights exist” was a core function of the ICO. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 7:53 am by Scott Bomboy
  In his 1897 report to the American Historical Association, Herman V. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:05 am by Ritika Singh
Orin Kerr writes in the Volokh Conspiracy about the Eleventh Circuit’s decision yesterday in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 4:32 pm by Shahram Miri
See Hearst v Ganzi (2006) 145 CA4th 1195. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
” The ICO released guidance on how data protection obligations can be met while ensuring people still have access to information. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
When separation fails, people are actually harmed, the government tells us. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Jurisdictional Boundaries of Prior Use within Britain: An analysis of the House of Lords’ judgments in Roebuck v Stirling (1774) and Brown v Annandale (1842)Barbara Henry (University of Hertfordshire)Commentator | Eva Hemmungs Wirtén (Linköping University, Sweden) Two cases, 60 years apart. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am by Ben
Those pesky TurtlesIt seems SiriusXM has decided to rely on the 1940 case of  RCA v Whiteman et al to persuade  U.S. [read post]