Search for: "Way v. State" Results 7641 - 7660 of 59,374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2007, 4:05 pm
§ 1003.23(b)(1), and states that there is no way to change the dates of filing. [read post]
30 May 2019, 1:09 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Comm’r,489 F.3d 1018, 1023 (9th Cir. 2007); United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 9:47 am by David J. Clark
Introduced by Assemblyman Phil Steck on January 15, 2015 and by State Senator Andrew Lanza on March 20, 2015, the bill (A2147/S4447) is entitled “Policy Against Restraint of Trade,” and operates from the premise that the Court of Appeals decision in BDO Seidman v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 9:47 am by David Clark
Introduced by Assemblyman Phil Steck on January 15, 2015 and by State Senator Andrew Lanza on March 20, 2015, the bill (A2147/S4447) is entitled “Policy Against Restraint of Trade,” and operates from the premise that the Court of Appeals decision in BDO Seidman v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 5:11 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In response, I urge a distinct way for the Court to conceptualize indigenous rights. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 5:21 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States District Judge Richard Seeborg does not give a damn what the United States Supreme Court says, he is going to ensure no one is executed in California regardless of controlling precedent.In Glossip v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm by Marty Lederman
  I wondered whether perhaps there was something in the record of the Masterpiece case that distinguished it from Elane in a way that troubled one or more Justices—something that might have been the subject of discussions among the Justices in the five months of conferences they had on the case after they received the record from the Colorado state court. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am by Sam Claydon, Olswang LLP
  They made the following pertinent observations: applying Swift v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] EWCA Civ 193, under the Convention a state need only pursue a legitimate aim in a proportionate way: Strasbourg does not demand that it do any more; the court must give considerable weight to informed legislative choices, at least where the state is seeking to reconcile the competing interests of different groups in society; and a legislative or… [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 11:29 pm by charley foster
Last week the Hawaii Supreme Court heard arguments in State v. [read post]