Search for: "SUITS v. STATE"
Results 7661 - 7680
of 32,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 5:05 am
In McDonald v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 7:32 pm
All of the 2017 state court suits also had parallel federal court suits. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:59 pm
The Supreme Court has granted certiorari review of Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:54 am
The Lewis v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 4:34 am
Record-A-Hit, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 7:47 pm
Landsman & Funk v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
Curcione, 657 F.3d 116.Addressing Petitioner's "Constitutional Claims", Appeals concluded that the district court correctly held that her constitutional claims against SUNY Albany are barred by the Eleventh Amendment, which precludes suits by citizens against states unless the state expressly waives its immunity or Congress abrogates that immunity. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
Curcione, 657 F.3d 116.Addressing Petitioner's "Constitutional Claims", Appeals concluded that the district court correctly held that her constitutional claims against SUNY Albany are barred by the Eleventh Amendment, which precludes suits by citizens against states unless the state expressly waives its immunity or Congress abrogates that immunity. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
Curcione, 657 F.3d 116.Addressing Petitioner's "Constitutional Claims", Appeals concluded that the district court correctly held that her constitutional claims against SUNY Albany are barred by the Eleventh Amendment, which precludes suits by citizens against states unless the state expressly waives its immunity or Congress abrogates that immunity. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
Curcione, 657 F.3d 116.Addressing Petitioner's "Constitutional Claims", Appeals concluded that the district court correctly held that her constitutional claims against SUNY Albany are barred by the Eleventh Amendment, which precludes suits by citizens against states unless the state expressly waives its immunity or Congress abrogates that immunity. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
The infringing activity, Nealy claimed, dated back to 2008—so ten years before he brought suit. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 12:43 pm
” Winter v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 8:39 am
Governor of State of Washington, (9th Cir., May 22, 2013), the 9th Circuit dismissed under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine an inmate's claim that state court judges violated his free exercise rights by refusing to transfer his case to an ecclesiastical tribunal.In Phillips v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 9:16 am
LEXIS 167347, Nov. 4, 2013), and held that a suit in which an inmate alleged he had been improperly removed from a faith-based dormitory and retaliated against for grieving the incident was properly removed from state to federal court, despite plaintiff's state law allegations.In Petty v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
Johnson County CCSending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction -- State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 9:04 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:35 am
In Blast v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
In Desimone v. [read post]
