Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 7661 - 7680
of 28,966
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2007, 12:18 am
As I noted yesterday (here), the Supreme Court's opinion in Gonzales v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:27 am
Applying the principles set forth by the Supreme Court in Younger v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:52 am
This is well within the normal competency of judges and is exactly what the lower court in Lee Optical v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The issues are complex, requiring the balancing of competing democratic values: transparency v autonomy; delegation v supervision; objectivity v diversity; tolerance of debate and disagreement v the need to reach some form of functional consensus for collective governance to continue. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 2:05 am
The case was heard on an expedited basis in light of the fact that the relevant US sanctions will be re-imposed on 4 November 2018. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:14 pm
[Post by Venkat] Ferrington v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:07 pm
" To which I might respond by noting that here's a difference between "framing the question in your favor," on the one hand, and "setting forth an alleged 'question presented' that's essentially tautological and doesn't shed light at all on what the case is actually about. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Application of this test to the facts of the nine lead cases concluded that the claimants each reasonably believed their injuries were capable of being attributed to the nuclear tests more than three years before the claims were issued, particularly in the light of their private and public claims about the cause of their conditions and also that it was common knowledge from at least the 1980s that exposure to fallout could cause many forms of cancer and other serious illnesses. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:30 am
[Editor's Note: Recently, the Consumer Products Safety Commission warned that holiday injuries are on the rise - from falls from ladders while stringing lights and cuts from broken glass Christmas ornaments. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:05 am
The second issue, in light of District of Columbia v Heller (__US__, 128 S Ct 2783 [2008]), unquestionably presents fair ground for litigation. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
In State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 7:59 pm
So I was particularly tickled to see his win in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 11:11 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:12 am
See United States v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 9:32 pm
Samsung in light of, and in deference to, Microsoft v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:54 pm
The AmeriKat defers to the IPKat's learned readers as to what they would do, in light of the Court of Appeal's decision, to rescue or prevent a perished priority. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:37 am
Following the discussion about the utility of the Supreme Court stating a rule as to whether, and for how long, a car stop can be extended beyond its lawful justification, all of which arose out of the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Rodriguez v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:48 am
Wisconsin, Howell v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 7:21 pm
However, recent developments in domestic law illegality have sparked debate on whether foreign law illegality too should be reformed in a similar light (see Ryder Industries Ltd v Chan Shui Woo [2016] 1 HKC 323, [36], [52]-[55]; cf Magdeev v Tsvetkov [2020] EWHC 887 (Comm), [331]-[332]). [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 7:23 am
United States v. [read post]
