Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 7661 - 7680 of 10,170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm by Madelaine Lane
  Accordingly, the court concluded that prejudice must be presumed under United States v Cronic, 466 US 648; 104 S Ct 2039; 80 L Ed 2d 657 (1984). [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 12:22 pm by Bruce Carton
Judge Simpson added that he also wished to remind counsel that "Wikipedia is not an acceptable source of legal authority in the United States District Courts. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Australia International Extradition Treaty with the United States May 14, 1974, Date-Signed May 8, 1976, Date-In-Force STATUS: The Treaty was signed at Washington on May 14, 1974. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:40 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036 TELEPHONE: (202) 828-8500 FAX (202) 293-3457 Dear Representative: The House is expected to vote this week on H.R. 910, the so-called Energy Tax Prevention Act. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
KEYNOTE Introduced by Michael Carroll, Professor of Law and Director, Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property, American University Washington College of Law Justin Hughes, Senior Advisor to the Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property, Head of United States Delegation to the World Intellectual Property Organization, and Professor of Law at Yeshiva University Cardozo School of Law In Geneva, working on GRTKF: Genetic resources, traditional… [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:42 pm by J. Gordon Hylton
Last week, noted sportswriter Sally Jenkins used her Washington Post column to ask why the United States government was devoting so many resources to the prosecution of baseball star Barry Bonds. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Colonial archive v. local sites; old works v. present recordings as part of the archive; new relations of control. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:05 am by JB
Both are fully available to the United States, and, moreover, the United States is currently employing them. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 10:15 pm by David Lat
Last week, the Court voted against rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
DONE at the city of Washington this seventeenth day of November in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred seventy-six and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred first. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
This case was decided on March 14, 2011, by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:05 am by JB
United States, the Supreme Court Justices agreed that the government could not halt the publication of the Pentagon Papers. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:43 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The treaty was ratified by the President of the United States on February 21, 1934. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
But I just ran across an excellent example that I hadn’t found when doing research on that case, State v. [read post]