Search for: "Young v. State"
Results 7661 - 7680
of 8,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2023, 9:24 am
See SEC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 8:10 am
Citing the cat’s paw doctrine, the court pointed out that in Poland v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:12 pm
John McCain wants to overturn Roe v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 5:12 pm
Flora et al. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:53 pm
” NCHRP Report at V-5, V-6. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:20 am
In FenF, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Although not entirely analogous, the Supreme Court’s 2011 ruling in Snyder v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:02 pm
If a senator asked a specific question—such as whether the nominee thinks Roe v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm
Zuiderveen Borgesius, Utrecht University – Centre for Intellectual Property Law and University of Amsterdam – Institute for Information Law (IViR) The Right to Be Forgotten v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 1:16 pm
One example emerged in the hearings during Kitzmiller v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 11:02 am
In 2004, the drugmaker agreed to pay the state of New York $2.5 million to resolve claims that officials suppressed research showing Paxil may increase suicide risk in young people. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 11:21 am
United States. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:21 am
Nothing could be more offensive to the virtuous part of the community, or more injurious to the tender morals of the young, than to declare such profanity lawful. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 6:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: Carmine Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 11:33 am
Do we even need a head of state? [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:08 pm
Here's the abstract: In May 2009, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm
Greg Lang v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 7:05 am
Shak v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:14 am
This law gave effect to European Directives and Regulations going back as far as 1997, and had been brought to the insurers’ attention then, and again in 2002 (Sarwar v Alam). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:25 am
Well, in Norelus v. [read post]
